More Visitors, More Stats

I can’t quite believe the growth in visitors to this site. Since I posted about my visitor count passing the quarter of a million mark on June 1st, I have had another 50,000 visitors taking the total count to well over 300,000! That’s 25,000 visitors a month. For little old me, I find that quite impressive. I’ve also had over half a million page views in that time. The page views counter passed three and a half million a while ago.

I know that being one of the feeds to the WordPress dashboard helps, but the vast majority of my visitors still come from search engines. Eleven of my top fifteen referrers are search engines. Of those, Google accounts for a whopping 76% of search engine hits. In fact, as I write this, the last 15 minutes has seen 15 unique visitors 12 of whom are visiting old pages via search engines.

With all this visitor activity, it certainly seems that my page caching is holding out ok. I still get some weird slow-downs on the server, but I think some of that is down to the statistics package I use, Power Pphlogger is starting to creak at the seams. I doesn’t appear that version 3 is going to appear any time soon, so I’m starting to look elsewhere.

15 thoughts on “More Visitors, More Stats

  1. I use PPhlogger also (ver 2.2.4) and have no problems with it. It’s currently holding 122Mb of data and while it’s a little slow it still does the job.

    I also have AWStats, it’s default with my host. I rarely use it but it looks ok.

    I have also used AXS:
    http://www.xav.com/scripts/axs/
    It’s a very good script but you’d need to clear out your records frequently.

  2. Hi AJ,
    Unfortunately, I also need to record more than just my blog pages, so a WP only stat package won’t do.

    Thanks for all the suggestions folks, I’m looking into a few different packages at the moment.

    Mike

  3. A typical virtual account with realtime PHP stats should be able to manage 50k visitors/day without a problem–if you are having difficulty with 25k/month, some sloppy spaghetti code could be the culprit, either that or MySQL is slowing you down–I personally prefer flat files, as does WebSideStory.

  4. Sorry I’m not too familiar with this script–but I looked at the feature list… Here are some things that could be slowing it down:

    “traceroutes by above.net” This could be slowing it down–traceroutes can take some time. You can probably do the traceroutes from your own server to speed things up, but traceroute info isn’t very useful anyway–maybe turn it off.

    Maybe shorten this timeout if it’s more than 1 day by default. “stores IP-adress+cookie to avoid multiple hits by the same user (you can set a timeout)” If this script runs in realtime, it could be wasting a lot of time scanning a big log file each time a new hit comes in. If you’re setting a cookie, why use a timeout at all? If the surfer has your cookie already then don’t count the hit as unique–simple–increment your raw count instead.

    “visitor-path” As with the previous feature, this code could be wasting a lot of time scanning the entire database over and over and over again matching IP’s… I’m not sure if this runs in realtime or what, but off the top of my head–you could just keep the hit list sorted in a flat file, then as new hits come in, just go down the list in order… if there’s a cookie already, then search for a match, then drop it in. In this manner, all the repeat visits will usually be right at the top of the list, saving a ton of search time… and you would know ahead of time if this was a repeat visit because you can test for the cookie before doing anything, and if there’s no cookie yet, set the cookie then add this hit to the top of your list in case they click something else… in summary, keeping your hit lists sorted saves your script from having to do much searching at all. I would imagine this is a lot faster than using mysql.

  5. PJ,
    Pphlogger doesn’t do its analysis in real time, it merely logs the information obtained from the javascript routine (or what it can glean from the noscript image request) straight to the database.

    The analysis, collating statistics, putting together page history/visitor path, etc. is done after the fact when you view the various reports.

  6. well i thought I would comment as I found your site through google and now have been reading, and let me say its been very entertaining, its like finding a needle in a haystack, finding a great readable blog!!!

    thanks for making my night
    hi and have a great day from Australia
    xx Nicola

  7. I havent been blogging very long, but I was running a web page from my home pc for a while, so I used to pay close attention just to the server logs, then added Nedstats, and then sitemeter, both free, but both add some more load time.

  8. Online stats services like the paid Sitemeter are good and fairly fast. Watch out for awstats which had some serious security holes (recently). My server was compromised through this stats package.

    Thanks TechniCool(Australia)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.